🔗 Share this article

Through a per curiam ruling, the highest judicial body permitted Texas to implement a revised congressional map that is projected to include up to five additional Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three order, issued on Thursday, upholds a appeal by the state to overturn a district court's ruling that had rejected the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Explanation

The lower court wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing considerable confusion and disturbing the sensitive equilibrium in elections, the order stated in explaining its ruling.

That lower court had determined that Texas had probably sorted voters by their race – a act known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it adopted the boundaries. It had mandated the state to revert to the boundaries drawn after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Opposition

With a sharply worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the court's decision. She argued that it disrespected the work of the district court, pointing out that its decision was written by a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, This court's stay ensures that Texas's new map, with all its increased political tilt, will govern next year's elections. And it means that many Texas citizens, unjustly, will be placed in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has declared consistently, is a infraction of the U.S. Constitution.

Countrywide Redistricting Fight

The ruling comes amid a national fight over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican majority. Typically, redistricting happens after a decennial population count. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a wave among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved redistricting plans that could add a number of more Republican-leaning seats. Democratic lawmakers, for their part, have pushed back with new maps in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas top lawyer praised the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order protected Texas's prerogative to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes supportive of Republicans. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he stated.

In contrast, opposition party leaders lamented the ruling. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the head of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another senior Democratic leader argued the court had another time shredded its standing by rubber-stamping a race-based map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he stated.