🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, star Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for portraying Vladimir Putin in a new film. The movie, though, could coincide so closely with the mythologized image circulated by Russian state media that, domestically, it reads as a endorsement instead of a critique.

The Crafted Strongman

For years, the Russian political apparatus and its pop-culture machine have worked together to craft a made-to-measure version of the president. This character is a political superhero without age or mistakes, an ex-intelligence officer reimagined as a local 007 who consistently understands more than he reveals.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long eclipsed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

One recent example is a television show launched last fall, helmed by a Kremlin supporter. Its main character is a fictional security officer selected by fate to “rescue” Russia from chaos. Although he is called a different name, the implication is unmistakable: the savior must be a familiar security officer.

International depictions often end up buttressing this identical story instead of undercutting it. A new film based on a popular book sets out to undermine the leader's mythology by presenting him not as a cause but as a symptom, moving the narrative weight to the political machinery surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, Putin is presented as having been picked by influential figures to steady the country because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. They visit him and all but beg him to take the top job. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the background, desiring permanent power.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the detached, unwilling mastermind shaped by destiny. Historically, none of this took place.

The Reality of the Casting Call

No one actually pleaded with him to take the job. The presidency was in essence a casting call with many contenders. Central to the selection stood a powerful businessman from the Yeltsin era who planned to control the country de facto.

• The shortlist featured various figures, among them a reformer subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• According to an expert who studied Putin’s biography, the chosen candidate simply fitted the necessary criteria: loyal, from the security services, and politically neutral.
• A property developer close to the events stated the key criterion was controllability and loyalty, not leadership.

“The goal wasn't a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Experts agree that the notion of him as a powerful KGB spy was constructed retrospectively. Stories about his “recruitment work” in East Germany fall apart under examination. In essence, he was an administrator and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not involved with actual agent work.

Interestingly, the shift to depicting him as a “spy” may in part have been triggered by the actor's arrival as 007. The grittier version led local outlets and online audiences to make comparisons with their leader. Mashup posters swapping the actor's likeness with his appeared on Moscow streets, fueling the increasing trend to frame him as a Russian 007.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

With Jude Law, an star popular with Russian audiences, the authorities will not miss the opportunity to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. Its omission of mass protests, the opposition, or prominent activists from its narrative, even though it includes the past decade, is a pleasant bonus for official messaging.

Domestically, the president is often an omnipotent figure who remains unseen on screen. His influence is signaled through photographs or calls “from above”. Now, he at last gets a famous actor's visage—one that could unintentionally echo the exact legends it might seek to examine.